Analysis Pages

Historical Context in On Liberty

Historical Context Examples in On Liberty:

Chapter I. Introductory.

🔒 12

"A person may cause evil to others not only by his actions but by his inaction, and in either case he is justly accountable to them for the injury..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

For a more recent example of this sentiment, Peter Singer, a contemporary utilitarian and professor at Princeton University, has spoken extensively on this issue in a modern context, particularly in the context of the ethics of wealth.

Subscribe to unlock »

"Akbar..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

Akbar, or Akbar the Great, ruled the Mughal Dynasty (in present day India) in the 16th Century C.E.

Subscribe to unlock »

"Charlemagne..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, is perhaps the most famous king of the Franks. He ruled in the 8th Century C.E., and appears famously in The Song of Roland.

Subscribe to unlock »

"Despotism is a legitimate mode of government in dealing with barbarians, provided the end be their improvement, and the means justified by actually effecting that end..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

This echoes the imperialist concept of the so-called White Man's Burden, the idea that Western society had a duty to pass on its lifestyle and traditions to the less-civilized (see annotation above about racist language) races, peoples, or states. For more context, see Rudyard Kipling's poem "The White Man's Burden."

Subscribe to unlock »

"It is accordingly on this battle-field, almost solely, that the rights of the individual against society have been asserted on broad grounds of principle, and the claim of society to exercise authority over dissentients, openly controverted..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

The first debates on personal liberties began with freedom of religion. Notably, this became a key aspect of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

Subscribe to unlock »

"Those who first broke the yoke of what called itself the Universal Church, were in general as little willing to permit difference of religious opinion as that church itself..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

The Anglican Church in England, for example, had little tolerance for other religions.

 

Subscribe to unlock »

"They preferred endeavouring to alter the feelings of mankind on the particular points on which they were themselves heretical, rather than make common cause in defence of freedom, with heretics generally..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

In the past, Mill argues, thinkers have not pushed for a democritization of truth. Rather, they have sought changes in society's framework that would make it consistent with their own.

Subscribe to unlock »

"Spartans and Helots..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

In Ancient Greece, the Helots were the main inhabitants of Laconia and Messenia. They were enslaved by Spartans and were considered their social inferiors.

Subscribe to unlock »

" To an ordinary man, however, his own preference, thus supported, is not only a perfectly satisfactory reason, but the only one he generally has for any of his notions of morality, taste, or propriety, which are not expressly written in his religious creed; and his chief guide in the interpretation even of that..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

Here Mill heavily criticizes a lack of thought in constructing moral frameworks. It might also be argued that he is criticizing religion here, suggesting that it lends itself to the acceptance of a moral framework that is not ones own.

 

 

Mill did not practice any religion and was an ardent critic of the institution. However, interestingly enough, in his essay on "The Utility of Religion," he argues that religion is effective in widely instituting a code of morality, though he also makes clear his belief that faith in a higher power is no longer required for this. (Source: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

 

Subscribe to unlock »

"except in some of the popular governments of Greece..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

Athens implemented rule by lot, also known as sortition, in the 6th Century B.C.E. This involved holding a lottery, the winning citizen of which would rule the state for a short period of time.

Subscribe to unlock »

"doctrine of Philosophical Necessity..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

Absolute Determinism. See The Doctrine of Philosophical Necessity published in 1777 by the British renaissance-man Joseph Priestly.

 

Subscribe to unlock »

"Wilhelm Von Humboldt..."   (Chapter I. Introductory.)

Wilhelm von Humboldt (June 22, 1767 – April 8, 1835) was a Prussian philosopher who founded the University of Berlin. His work was primarily in linguistics and education, and his work—particularly On the Limits of State Action—influenced Mill's thoughts and writings. In fact, von Humboldt is often credited with outlining the first versions of the "Harm Principle," which Mill expands upon. Today, this principle is seen by many as the core belief of Libertarianism.

Subscribe to unlock »

Analysis Pages